Join Free About Support Login 
Home Blog Pricing Community Training OverviewSEO Training
Pay Per Click Ads
Tracking Results
Website Credibility
Site Monetization
Videos & Audio
Marketing Tools
Interviews
Discounts
Tools Public Tools
Free Firefox Extensions
Keyword Tool
Analytics Tools
Keyword Research
Competitive Research
Pay Per Click Tools
Link Analysis
Rank Checkers
Members Only (Join Now)
Competitive Research
Local Rank
Website Health Check
Duplicate Content Checker
Domain Keyword Tool
Keyword List Comparison
SEO Site Planner
Hub Finder
Videos Home ? Blogs ? Aaron Wall's blog Gain a competitive advantage Today! Say What!? Previous Which Source Do You Trust Most? Next GoogleBowling, Negative SEO & Outing Consumer Ad Awareness in Search Results
Apr 15thby Aaron Wall3 comments posted in internet
For the following study, we asked "Does this search result have ads on it? " to 1,000 searchers, per search results. Due to these surveys requiring a smaller image (to fit the ad unit size) we chose search results that generally had more ads on them (typically 3 or 4) so that the background had a significant portion of real estate devoted to ads, in spite of its small size. The one exception here was DuckDuckGo, as it only displays one ad at most even on highly commercial keywords like credit cards.
Other than resizing the search result to fit, the only modifications we generally made were removing the graphic picture from the Wikipedia page near the top of the DuckDuckGo SERP (since a prior study showed that users presumed there was a correlation between graphics and the perception of ads) and that in most cases we removed the right sidebar. We did include the sidebar ads on 3 different Bing, Google, & Yahoo! search results so that we could compare the impact of sidebar ads vs not having a sidebar.
Executive SummaryThe 3 big takeaways are:
For most search engines, people are generally unaware of ads vs organic results if there are no ads in the right column ... most of these yes/no questions came down to about a 50/50 vote, even though all of them had ads on them. It is every bit as true today as it was in 2003. If there is a right column, the percent of people who voted that there are ads on the page jumps significantly. Thus it is pretty safe to say that people think ads are in the right column & that the right column is ads. In part perhaps due to placement and a lack of user knowledge between ads vs content, paid ads do significantly cannibalize organic traffic.SERP heat maps have shown heavy focus on the left column. This is perhaps why Google feels comfortable putting brand oriented Google+ promotions in the right column, while they put further ads at the bottom of the organic search results - people tend to view the left rail as organic search results and the right rail as ads. In the past Google also stated that graphic product ads in the right column got about double the CTR of text ads in the same location, thus if Google ever offers search-branding graphical campaigns I would expect those to primarily appear in the right column.Interestingly, among major search engines, Yahoo! (without sidebar) got more "yes, it has ads" votes than other search engines. In fact, Yahoo! without sidebar ads scored within 1% of Bing with sidebar ads. Years ago they decided to get out of search in part because they under-monetized competitors (in part due to paying arbitrages to destroy their click value by pumping their network full of fraudulent clicks). Advertisers didn't even have a mechanism to opt out of such scammy ad syndication until AFTER Yahoo! signed the search deal with Bing. Yahoo! still under-monetizes search (& complains about it publicly, blaming Bing) in part because Bing cut out a lot of the arbitrage, in part due to ad matching issues on longtail queries, and in part because Yahoo!'s ad background color is more noticeable to users, where other portals and search companies like Google & Bing blend it in so well that many users simply can not see it, particularly on laptops and older computers. Ask is the most aggressive ad blender of all search engines. If you click through to their results from a Google ad it plants a cookie to remove the background color on the Ask search result ads on all subsequent searches until you clear that cookie.Combined Survey ResultsFor the question Does this search results have ads on it?
search engine yes no AOL53.1% (+3.9 / -3.9)46.9% (+3.9 / -3.9)Ask52.0% (+4.0 / -4.1)48.0% (+4.1 / -4.0)Ask Arbitrage51.6% (+3.9 / -3.9)48.4% (+3.9 / -3.9)Bing50.2% (+3.8 / -3.8)49.8% (+3.8 / -3.8)Bing w Sidebar57.7% (+3.7 / -3.8)42.3% (+3.8 / -3.7)Dogpile44.7% (+4.1 / -4.0)55.3% (+4.0 / -4.1)Duck Duck Go52.3% (+3.9 / -3.9)47.7% (+3.9 / -3.9)Google54.5% (+4.0 / -4.0)45.5% (+4.0 / -4.0)Google w Sidebar62.9% (+3.6 / -3.8)37.1% (+3.8 / -3.6)Yahoo!56.8% (+3.9 / -4.0)43.2% (+4.0 / -3.9)Yahoo! w Sidebar59.8% (+3.9 / -4.1)40.2% (+4.1 / -3.9)User Voting Images
Here are the images users saw when they voted:
AOL SERP
Prior to doing the above study, we asked users to please click on the search result which has an ad in it, listing search results side by side. Any bias presented in this (outside of both having smaller than actual sizes) impacts both images. At first we did a regular Google SERP where we included the branding & then we followed up with one that is more zoomed in on the actual search results but does not include branding. On the one that was less zoomed in people thought the map was an ad more often, but upon further zooming they thought it was roughly 50/50.
Does this search result have ads on it?
layout yes no Google+ without ads56.3% (+3.1 / -3.1)43.7% (+3.1 / -3.1)Google+ with ads 56.9% (+3.2 / -3.2)43.1% (+3.2 / -3.2)large top ads w/o Google+53.6% (+3.2 / -3.2)46.4% (+3.2 / -3.2)
Searchers tend to think that Google+ integration in the right rail is an ad unit. More people voted that Google+ without ads had ads in the search results than a SERP with 4 AdWords ad units and no Google+ integration.
Search Engine Ad Background ColorAfter seeing that users generally guessed no better than a coin toss at best in most cases, we decided to ask What background color do Google search results use to denote top left search advertisements? The same question was asked of Yahoo! & Bing search results.
GoogleGoogle All (1147) none, they are white 49.7% (+3.2 / -3.2) blue 25.5% (+3.0 / -2.8) yellow 10.6% (+2.3 / -2.0) pink 7.0% (+2.1 / -1.6) purple 7.2% (+2.2 / -1.7) Yahoo!Yahoo! All (1080) none, they are white 44.6% (+3.4 / -3.4) blue 20.9% (+3.0 / -2.7) yellow 15.6% (+2.7 / -2.4) magenta 11.2% (+2.5 / -2.1) orange 7.7% (+2.3 / -1.8) BingBing All (1063) none, they are white 49.0% (+3.6 / -3.6) blue 23.5% (+3.2 / -3.0) yellow 13.0% (+2.8 / -2.4) purple 7.5% (+2.4 / -1.9) pink 7.1% (+2.4 / -1.8) SummaryBing scored highest, however blue also scored as the 2nd highest color for all 3 search engines. Nearly half of searchers believe that top ads have a white background, which highlights a general widespread lack of awareness of search ads.
Search Engine % Who Answered Correctly Bing (blue) 23.5% Yahoo! (magenta) 11.2% Google (yellow) 10.6% Ad Location on the SERPGiven how little awareness users have of ad background color, I decided to ask: Where might ads appear on search results at top search engines like Bing & Google?
Vote All (1144) right column 34.2% (+3.4 / -3.3) all 3 locations 29.6% (+3.2 / -3.0) search results do not carry ads 19.4% (+3.0 / -2.7) top of the left column 9.2% (+2.5 / -2.0) bottom of the left column 7.6% (+2.4 / -1.9)Less than 3 in 10 answered the question correctly & nearly 20% of people do not think search results carry any ads, which explains how an algorithmic penalty can create a bad quarter, why Google was sued in Australia for misleading ads & why the Rosetta Stone vs Google case was overturned. Next time you hear a search engineer talk about clearly labeling paid links, ask them why they do such a poor job of it themselves!
User Trust in Ad Versus Organic ResultsEver since search engines have weeded out some of the more exploitative reverse billing fraud ads, trust in online ads has been growing. Based on the above, we wanted to see how users perceive ads vs organic search results, so I asked: Search engines include both algorithmic search results and ads in them. Which do you trust more?
Answer All (1168) I trust both equally 45.8% (+3.3 / -3.2) Algorithmic search results 40.9% (+3.2 / -3.1) Ads that appear in search results 13.3% (+2.5 / -2.2)The above result surprised me given how people disliked money influencing search results. It is a strong compliment to the ads that only 40% of people trust the editorial more than the ads. However this number might be thrown off by the fact that many people are unaware of where the ads actually appear in the search results & what results are ads. (As noted above, most people voted that they thought that either search ads were only in the right column or that there weren't ads in the SERPs.)
Making Up for the Small Image ProblemOne of the bigger issues with Google's current survey solution is that you are limited to rather small sized images. Such limitations do not harm asking a question like "what color does Google use for x" but they do make the search result a bit harder to see. To compensate for that problem we ran a separate survey on AYTM, where users were able to view a search result in full screen mode for 10 seconds & then they were asked 3 questions.
The purpose of the first question was to put a few seconds in between them seeing the image and them answering the second question. One other improvement that was made here (in addition to allowing users to see a larger sized search result image) was that we added an "I am not sure" answer to the questions. Below are the responses in table + graphic form, followed by the AYTM widget.
Where May Ads Appear on Google's Search Results Page?
Even directly after viewing a search result with 3 ads in it, most users are uncertain of where ads may appear, what color the ads are, and if the search result even had any ads in it!
Users confusing the yellow background as white shortly after seeing it is anything but an accident:
In a RGB color space, hex #fef7e6 is composed of 99.6% red, 96.9% green and 90.2% blue. Whereas in a CMYK color space, it is composed of 0% cyan, 2.8% magenta, 9.4% yellow and 0.4% black. It has a hue angle of 42.5 degrees, a saturation of 92.3% and a lightness of 94.9%. #fef7e6 color hex could be obtained by blending #ffffff with #fdefcd. .
If you have an older monitor or a laptop which you are viewing at an angle these colors are nearly impossible to see.
Embed The AYTM Graph in Your WebsiteHere is the AYTM widget of the above 1,000 person survey, which you can embed in your website.
Ask Your Target Market via SEO Book Embed Code:
Ask Your Target Market via SEO Book
Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.
Already have an account? Login to share your opinions. CommentsMGreenbank April 16, 2012 - 9:18amSample Q
Interesting research. Can you expand on the sample you used. i.e. numbers and type of respondents?
Aaron Wall April 16, 2012 - 12:27pmsure, great question...
... on the top group of 11 questions comparing the engines against each other, I asked 1000 people each question. The AYTM was also 1000 people per question, but each person on AYTM saw a serp than all 3 questions in the series.
All the other questions were asked on a one-off basis & had somewhere between 1,000 and 1,500 responses. If you look at the top of the tables you will see something like "all (1168)" ... so what happens there is maybe you order 1,500 responses, but Google only has demographic breakdowns for 1168 of the people.
The respondents were supposed to be fairly mixed & representative of the general United States population based on AYTM's panel & how Google Consumer Surveys work. You can get more background information from either at AYTM.com and http://www.google.com/insights/consumersurveys/home
josephraj April 20, 2012 - 12:15pmgreat
You Brought great awareness.wonderful post.
New to the site? Join for Free and get over $300 of free SEO software.
Once you set up your free account you can comment on our blog, and you are eligible to receive our search engine success SEO newsletter.
Already have an account? Login to share your opinions. Over 100 training modules, covering topics like: keyword research, link building, site architecture, website monetization, pay per click ads, tracking results, and more. An exclusive interactive community forum Members only videos and tools Additional bonuses - like data spreadsheets, and money saving tips
We love our customers, but more importantly Our customers love us! 
My Account username password Signup for FREE account 
SEO Community New Threads 
SEO Competitive Research SEO Book Keyword List Comparison Tool SEO Toolbar Google Rank Checker Top AdSense Keyword Lists Link Building 101 Google's Matt Cutts on Brands Sister Site
Visit PPC Blog, our new sister site focused on pay per click marketing.
Site MapBloggingBrief History of Search TechnologyBrief Summary of ContentsBuying SEO ServicesContent Management CopywritingDomainingInformation ArchitectureInternet Marketing toolsKeyword ResearchMonetizationLink BuildingOn Page OptimizationPage TitlesPay Per Click / AdWordsSearch Engines / GoogleSelling SEO ServicesSocial InteractionTracking ResultsUsabilityWeb DirectoriesWebsite CredibilityWebsite DesignWebsite HostingWhy Search is Such a Powerful Marketing Channel Related Posts How Many Search Engines? Search Again or Click On the Second Page of Search Results? General Consumer Awareness of SEM & SEO Paid Placement in Search Engines Ad Retargeting Google+ Integration Editorial Objectivity The Return of GoTo / Overture (and AOL)? SEO Lemons Google Admits 'Organic Results' Are Filler To Pump Deceptive Ads at Consumers Recent comments NeonDog, Google DID ignore 3 hours 45 min ago sad but true 7 hours 14 min ago Thanks Marty, it'll be 16 hours 59 min ago great example James 18 hours 28 min ago simple 18 hours 55 min ago We got tanked too and managed to get Cutt's feedback on why! 22 hours 55 min ago Not Working 1 day 4 hours ago yup ... 1 day 4 hours ago Quite right 1 day 5 hours ago We're getting there 1 day 5 hours ago Tweet
Have a question? Join our training program today and get the Google rankings, search traffic, growth, and profits you deserve!
Not convinced? Try our free 7-day course for beginners. After viewing it we hope to see you join our community! Best of luck growing your business & we hope our site helps increase your rankings!
I'd like to learn more about: Link Building On-Site SEO Keyword Research Domain Names Tracking Results Site Architecture Website Monetization About SEO BookIn Short? We offer the #1 SEO training program. And it comes with tools, videos, a private member's forum, and so much more.
Home Join Blog Free SEO Tools SEO Glossary Community Training Videos Affiliates About Archives Support SEO Training Overview SEO Strategy PPC Tracking Credibility Monetization Video & Audio Premium SEO Tools Interviews Discounts SEO Toolbar Competitive Research Tool Rank Checker Keyword Suggestion Tool Keyword Comparison Keyword Domains Local Rank Hub Finder 
This website is powered by peanut butter, the cosmos, and you! :)
© 2003 - 2012 SEOBook.com
Email Address Pick a Username Yes, please send me "7 Days to SEO Success" mini-course (a $57 value) for free. Learn More
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.
No comments:
Post a Comment